Wp/104547/2022 Of Girgaonkar Associates v. Principal / Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
17 Nov 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/104547/2022 Of Girgaonkar Associates v. Principal / Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
17 Nov 2022
Assessment year(s)
2011-2012
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/104547/2022 Of Girgaonkar Associates v. Principal / Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
WP No. 104547 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 17 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 104547 OF 2022 (TRES)
BETWEEN:
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MANOJ D PUKALE.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
WP No. 104547 of 2022
4. PRINCIPAL/ CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (REGIONAL FACELESS ASSESSEMENT CENTRE) PANAJI (REGIONAL FACELESS ASSESSEMENT CENTRE) PANAJI
(PR/C/CIT/REFAC)
2ND FLOOR, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, E.D.C. COMPLEX, PATTO
PLAZA, PANAJI-403001
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV., FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WP IS FILED PRAYING TO, WHEREFORE, THE PETITIONER PRAYS THAT THIS HONOURABLE HIGH COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ISSUE WRIT/S OR ISSUE OF APPROPRIATE WRIT/S OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF WRIT/S TO ENFORCE FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS CONFERRED BY PART III OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, 1950 FOR THE ABOVE CAUSE.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
1.Petitioner submitted the representation with the 2[nd]respondent stating that the petitioner filed Form No.1 on 29/6/2016 for the assessment year 2011-2012 to 2016-2017 and received Form No.2 from the department on 07/10/2016 and accordingly, the petition had paid the tax due and submitted Form No.3 on 3/2/2020 for issue of Form No.4. The petitioner’s grievance is that the respondents’ department have not issued Form No.4 under the Income Tax Declaration Scheme-2016.
WP No. 104547 of 2022
2.Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that the representation submitted by the petitioner will be considered in accordance with law, if reasonable time is granted.
3.Therefore, it is expedient to dispose of the writ petition, directing the respondent No.2 to consider the representation dated 8/9/2022 submitted by the petitioner at Annexure-Q and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
Sd/- JUDGE
VB
List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.