Wp/10541/2020 Of Anand Cine Service Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer

W.P.No.10541 of 2020 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., Today, this matter is listed under the caption “For Being Mentioned”. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that at paragraph Nos.2, 3 and 5 of the order dated 13.10.2023 passed in the present writ petition, it has been wrongly mentioned as Rs.17,95,187/- instead of Rs.70,95,187/-. Therefore, he would request this Court to rectify the said typographical error and issue a fresh order copy. 3. Accordingly, paragraph Nos.2, 3 and 5 of the said order is modified as follows: “2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this matter, the learned Official Liquidator had already filed an application for a direction to refund Rs.70,95,187/- vide Comp.A.No.291 of 2020. 1/4 3. In the present case, the second respondent is claiming that the petitioner is liable to pay a sum of Rs.18.01 crore. However, the said claim was disputed by the petitioner since the second respondent had not produced any order obtaining from any Court of law with regard to the dues of the petitioner. All these aspects have been considered in Comp.A.No.291 of 2020 filed before the Company Court and ultimately, the Company Court held that the second respondent is not entitled for any refund and only the petitioner is entitled for refund of a sum of Rs.70,95,187/-. 4. .................... 5. In such view of the matter, this Court directs the first respondent to refund a sum of Rs.70,95,187/- to the petitioner within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.” 5. With regard to the remaining portion of the order, there is no need for any modification. 2/4 6. The Registry is directed to make necessary corrections in terms of the Order and issue a fresh order copy. 20.10.2023 nsa 3/4 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.No.10541 of 2020 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY, J., nsa W.P.No.10541 of 2020 20.10.2023