Case LawHigh Court › Wp/106293/2023 Of Shri Shivlingeshwar Co...

Wp/106293/2023 Of Shri Shivlingeshwar Co Operative Credit Society v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1 And Tps Bagalkot

High Court 13 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/106293/2023 Of Shri Shivlingeshwar Co Operative Credit Society v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1 And Tps Bagalkot
Date of order
13 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/106293/2023 Of Shri Shivlingeshwar Co Operative Credit Society v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 1 And Tps Bagalkot, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Resultantly, the Writ Petition is allowed and remanded.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed byTHEJASKUMAR NLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 106293 OF 2023 (TIT) BETWEEN: SHRI. SHIVLINGESHWAR CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY, AT/POST: SAIDAPUR, TAL: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 316, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, SHRI. RAMESH BASAPPA MOPAGAR, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC: SECRETARY, R/O: BISANAL, RABAKAVI BANAHATTI, DIST: BAGALKOT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGRAM.S. KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 AND TPS BAGALKOT, AIKAR BHAVAN, SECTOR 24, NAVANAGAR, DIST: BAGALKOT-587 102. 2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.THIRUMALESH., ADVOCATE FOR R1-R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sangram Kulkarni., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.M.Thirumalesh., counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. 2. Though the matter is listed today for orders, it is heard finally. 3. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Certiorari to quash the assessment order dated 17.03.2022 passed under Section 147 R/w Section 144 R/w Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in DIN No: ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1040934151(1) for the Assessment Year 2014-15 vide Annexure-H. 4. Heard the arguments and perused the Writ papers with care. 5. The petitioner is a Cooperative Society registered under the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 and is engaged in the business of providing credit facilities to its members. The petitioner after its registration, applied for the issuance of a PAN card and was assigned the status of a Firm instead of AOP and PAN bearing No. was - 3 - issued. However, in the year 2017, a new PAN number was assigned bearing No. . The first respondent issued notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 relating to Assessment Year 2014-15on the pretext that the petitioner has not filed its returns of income for the said Assessment Year by referring to the old PAN number. Since the petitioner did not have the password, requested the first respondent to reset the password. Despite requests, the issue was not resolved to reset the password. However, an ex-parte assessment order was passed on 17.03.2022. This is untenable. The respondents have failed to consider that the petitioner was assigned with new PAN number and therefore, could not reply to the notice that was sent by referring to the old PAN number. Because of the ex-parte order, this Court considers it proper to allow the assessee to contest the matter by taking part in the proceedings. Hence, the matter requires a remand. Therefore, the assessment order is liable to be set aside, so it is set aside. 6. The Writ of Certiorari is ordered. The assessment order dated 17.03.2022 passed under Section 147 R/w Section 144 R/w Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in DIN No: ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1040934151(1) for the Assessment Year 2014-15 vide Annexure-H is quashed. The matter is remanded to the first respondent to the stage of reply to 148 notice and to pass a fresh order. All contentions of the parties are kept open. This Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Since the petitioner is represented by its counsel, the petitioner is directed to appear before the first respondent on 21.10.2024 without awaiting further notice. 7. Resultantly, the Writ Petition is allowed and remanded. TKN/MRP LIST NO.: 3 SL NO.: 1 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan