Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Convent v. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal
High Court
05 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Convent v. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
05 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Convent v. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF APRIL, 2021
BEFORE.
THE HON‘BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM;W.P.NO.106708/ 2016 (IT)BETWEEN
M/S SPOORTHI SADAN CONVENT,NEAR ANJUMAN COLLEGE,HUNASAGIT ROAD,TALLIKORI-586214,|BIJAPUR DISTRICT,REPRESTNED BY ITS SUPERIOR,SR.ELIZABETH KURIAKOSE,AGED 60 YEARS, D/O MR.KURIAKOSE MAMPALLY.
. PETITIONER|
(BY SRI.S PARTHASARATHI, ADV.& SRI.K.R.KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.)
ANI
1. THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, |PUNDALIK NIWAS,1ST FLOOR, NEAR PATTO BRIDGE,PANAJI, GOA-403001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM-590001.
RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ,ADV. )
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 2277 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT A.TO.QUASH THE ORDER IN ITA NO.404/PAN.2014 DATED:09.06.2016.(ANNEXURE-K) PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. B. DIRECT THE1ST RESPONDENT TO ADJUDICATE THE APPEAL NO.404/PAN.2014|WITHOUT BEING INFLUENCED BY THE JUDGMENT DATED:1/7.02.2016OF THIS HON BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100066/2015, VIDE ANNEXURE-F. |
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMIANRY HEARING ‘B’|GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The captioned writ petition is filed challenging tne.impugned order which is appeal able under Section 260A of|the Income Tax Act.
2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would.also bring to the notice of this Court that the writ petition|was filed within time prescribed to prefer an appeal.
‘3In that view of the matter, writ petition is disposed ofreserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal in the|event petitioner opting to prefer an appeal ne is entitled for|the penefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
HMB/-
Sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.