Case LawHigh Court › Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Con...

Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Convent v. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal

High Court 05 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Convent v. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal
Date of order
05 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/106708/2016 Of M/S Spoorthi Sadan Convent v. The Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 5 DAY OF APRIL, 2021 BEFORE. THE HON‘BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM;W.P.NO.106708/ 2016 (IT)BETWEEN M/S SPOORTHI SADAN CONVENT,NEAR ANJUMAN COLLEGE,HUNASAGIT ROAD,TALLIKORI-586214,|BIJAPUR DISTRICT,REPRESTNED BY ITS SUPERIOR,SR.ELIZABETH KURIAKOSE,AGED 60 YEARS, D/O MR.KURIAKOSE MAMPALLY. . PETITIONER| (BY SRI.S PARTHASARATHI, ADV.& SRI.K.R.KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.) ANI 1. THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, |PUNDALIK NIWAS,1ST FLOOR, NEAR PATTO BRIDGE,PANAJI, GOA-403001. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM-590001. RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ,ADV. ) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 2277 OFTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING THIS HON’BLE COURT A.TO.QUASH THE ORDER IN ITA NO.404/PAN.2014 DATED:09.06.2016.(ANNEXURE-K) PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. B. DIRECT THE1ST RESPONDENT TO ADJUDICATE THE APPEAL NO.404/PAN.2014|WITHOUT BEING INFLUENCED BY THE JUDGMENT DATED:1/7.02.2016OF THIS HON BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100066/2015, VIDE ANNEXURE-F. | THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMIANRY HEARING ‘B’|GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The captioned writ petition is filed challenging tne.impugned order which is appeal able under Section 260A of|the Income Tax Act. 2.Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would.also bring to the notice of this Court that the writ petition|was filed within time prescribed to prefer an appeal. ‘3In that view of the matter, writ petition is disposed ofreserving liberty to the petitioner to prefer an appeal in the|event petitioner opting to prefer an appeal ne is entitled for|the penefit under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. HMB/- Sd/-.JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan