Wp/107672/2017 Of Shri. Sangappa v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
07 Sep 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/107672/2017 Of Shri. Sangappa v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Sep 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/107672/2017 Of Shri. Sangappa v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of thememo and submission made, petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THB HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 7[th]day of September 2018
Before
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAYV
2Writ Petition No.10/76/72/201/7IT)
BBRTWEE
ohri Sangappa, —»/o Shivayogappa,Takkalaki Uri Jadar C/o,H.B.Haripalled,At. Post Anagawadi Taluk,|Bilagi-587116, Dist: Bagalkot.
...Petitioner
(By Sri. H.R.Kambiyavar & Aravinda Deshpande,Advocates)|
AN
1. Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, Bagalkot.
2. Income Tax Officer,Ward-1, & TPS Bagalkot.
...Respondents
(By Sri. Y.V.Raviraj, Advocate)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227of the Constitution of India praying to quash theproceedings initiated under Section 147 of the Actbearing No.F.No.AQNPT9782F/ITO-W-1/2017-18 dated
29 06.2017|issued.by|the"[nd]respondentvideAnnexure-L insofar as petitioner is concerned. ©
This Writ Petition coming on for Orders this day,|the Court, made the following:
ORDER
Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo statingthat he intends to withdraw the petition. In view of thememo and submission made, petition is dismissed.
No further orders required as_ regards’ thinterlocutory applications pending.
Kms
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue