Case LawHigh Court › Wp/108513/2019 Of Shri.shashikant S. Sid...

Wp/108513/2019 Of Shri.shashikant S. Sidnal v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 22 Aug 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/108513/2019 Of Shri.shashikant S. Sidnal v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/108513/2019 Of Shri.shashikant S. Sidnal v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 108513 of 2019 The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed byPREMCHANDRA M RLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 108513 OF 2019 (TIT) BETWEEN: SHRI. SHASHIKANT.S.SIDNAL, HOUSE NO.7309, ANJANEYA NAGAR, ANJANEYA NAGAR (MM EXTENSION), BELAGAVI-590 016. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA AND SRI. H.R.KAMBIYAVAR., ADVOCATES) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, BELAGAVI. 2. THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV), 3 FLOOR, TRISTAR BUILDING, PATTO, PANAJI, GOA-403 001. 3. THE ASST. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INV), UNIT-II, 3 FLOOR, TRISTAR BUILDING, PATTO, PANAJI, GOA-403 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. Y.V.RAVIRAJ AND SRI. M.THIRUMALESH., ADVOCATES) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Prasanna., learned counsel on behalf of Sri.Ashok A.Kulkarni., for the petitioner and Sri.M.Thirumalesh., learned counsel for the respondents have appeared in person. Counsel for the petitioner submits that a memo has been filed stating that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the petition. Counsel therefore, submits that the memo may be placed on record and the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried by the Court, counsel Sri.Prasanna., submits that the petitioner has taken a conscious decision to withdraw the petition and he shall not seek recalling of the order if an order is passed. The oral submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner and the memo is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:11942 WP No. 108513 of 2019 The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. MRP List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan