Wp/108849/2017 Of Mr. Vikram Mehta v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds)
High Court
15 Mar 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/108849/2017 Of Mr. Vikram Mehta v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds)
Date of order
15 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/108849/2017 Of Mr. Vikram Mehta v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
an
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
ON THE 15 DAY OF MARCH, 2018
BEFORE.
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA|
$WRIT PETITION NO.108849 OF 2017 (GMRES)C/W WRIT PETITION NO.108013 OF 2017
IN W.P.NO.108849/201/7
BETWEEN
MR. VIKRAM MEHTA.AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,DIRECTORQUEST GLOBAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LITD.,R/AT: VASWANI PINNACLE APARTMENTS,B-102, WHITEFIELD MAIN ROAD,BENGALURU-560066.
... PETITIONER
(BY SRI.LH.R.KAMBIYAVAR, ADV. &SRI. SURYANARAYAN, ADV.)
AND
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (TDS).
PANAJI, GOA, GROUND FLOOR,PUNDALIK NIWAS, RUA-DE-OUREM,PANAJI, GOA-403001.PUNDALIK NIWAS, RUA-DE-OUREM,PANAJI, GOA-403001.
2 |THE INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENT,GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS,RUA-DE-OQUREM, PANAJI, GOA-403001,GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS,RUA-DE-OQUREM, PANAJI, GOA-403001,
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE!
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME-TAX (TDS), CIRCLE-PANAJI.INCOME-TAX (TDS), CIRCLE-PANAJI.
3.QUEST GLOBAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LITD.,QUEST SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE,NO.437/A, HATTARGI VILLAGE,YEMAKANAMARADI HOBLI, HUKKERI TALUK,BELAGAVI DISTRICT-591243,REPRESENTED HEREIN BY|MR.ANKUR CHHAPOLIKA.
.., RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.LY.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV. FOR R11
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 276)AND 2277 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITHSECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER.DATED 09.12.2016 PASSED BY THE l RESPONDENT UNDERSECTION 279(1) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, BEARING|F.NO.QUEST GLOBAL / CIT (TDS) / PROSECUTION / 2016-17|(ANNEXURE-E) AND ETC.
IN W.P.NO.108013/201/7
BEITWEE
QUEST GLOBAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LITD.,QUEST SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE,NO.437/A, HATTARGI VILLAGE,YEMAKANAMARADI HOBLI, HUKKERI TALUK,BELAGAVI DISTRICT-591243, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY ITSAUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVEMR.ANKUR CHHAPOLIKA,. AGE-32 YEARS... PETLTIONER
(BY SRI. KING & PARTRIDGE,SRI.T.SURYANARAYANA, SRI.NITIN PRASAD,SRI.H.R.KAMBIYAVAR, SRI.J.KEERTHANA REDDY, |SRI.TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR, SRI.SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVS.)
AND
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (TDS).PANAJI, GOA, GROUND FLOOR,|PANAJI, GOA, GROUND FLOOR,|
PUNDALIK NIWAS, RAU-DE-OUREM, PANAJI,
GOA-403001.
2.THE INCOME-TAX DEPARTMENTGROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS, GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS,
RUA-DE-OQUREM, PANAJI, GOA-403001,
REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THE!
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME-TAX (TDS), CIRCLE-PANAJI.
3.SRI.VIKRAM MEHTA, DIRECTOR,437/A QUARTER, HATTARGI VILLAGE,YEMAKANMARADI, HOBLI, HUKKERI, |TQ: BELAGAVI, AGE: 47 YUEARS437/A QUARTER, HATTARGI VILLAGE,YEMAKANMARADI, HOBLI, HUKKERI, |TQ: BELAGAVI, AGE: 47 YUEARS
437/A QUARTER, HATTARGI VILLAGE,
YEMAKANMARADI, HOBLI, HUKKERI, |
.., RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV. FOR R11)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 220)AND 2277 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA READ WITHSECTION 482 OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER.DATED 09.12.2016 PASSED BY THE l RESPONDENT UNDERSECTION 279(1)OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, BEARING|F.NO.QUEST GLOBAL / CIT / TDS / PROSECUTION / 2016-17|(ANNEXURE-D) AND ETC.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS|DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
������
�����
�/012/3�45627/8�951�:;/�</:=:=52/17�;07�9=8/3�>/>57�
7//?=2@�8/0A/�:5�B=:;310B�:;/�B1=:�</:=:=527���
�2�A=/B�59�:;/�70=3�>/>57��B1=:�</:=:=527�01/�
3=7>=77/3�07�B=:;310B2���
�7;��
�3&$�������
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.