Wp/109576/2014 Of M/S. Gold Palace v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
03 Jan 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/109576/2014 Of M/S. Gold Palace v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
03 Jan 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/109576/2014 Of M/S. Gold Palace v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
- 1 -
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF JANUARY 2019
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.NARENDAR
WRIT PETITION NOS.109576-580/2014 (T-IT)
BETWEEN
1.M/S. GOLD PALACE MARATHA GALLI, HUBLI
R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI RAJU PATADIA
2.M/S. DIAMOND JEWELLERY MART
BROADWAY HUBLI
R/BY ITS PROPRIETOR
SRI HARJEEVANDAS PATADIA
(BY SRI. GANGADHAR J.M., ADV.)
... PETITIONERS
AND
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C R BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
CIRCLE 1 (1) HUBLI 580025
3. THE TAX RECOVERY OFFICER
RANGE -1, C R BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBLI ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF PROHIBITION OR SUCH OTHER WRIT OR DIRECTIONS HOLDING THAT THE ACTION OF THE RESPONDENTS IN SITTING IN THE PETITIONERS PREMISES AND COLLECTING THE DAILY COLLECTIONS AS ARREARS OF
TAXERS OF M/S. A.M.CONSTRUCTIONS IS ILLEGAL AND CONTRARY TO LAW AND VIOLATIVE OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO CARRY ON BUSINESS GUARANTEED UNDER ARTICLE 19(1)(G) OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA WHEN M/S.A.M.CONSTRUCTIONS STATUTORY APPEALS ARE PENDING BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo praying leave of the Court to withdraw the wit petitions and it is prayed that the petitions be dismissed as not pressed.
Memo is taken on record.
Petitions are dismissed as not pressed.
Rsh
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.