Case Law › High Court › Wp/1098/2016 Of Flex Art Foil Ltd v. Dy....

Wp/1098/2016 Of Flex Art Foil Ltd v. Dy. Director Of Income Tax (Inv), Unit-Iii, Mumbai And 4 Ors

High Court 20 Apr 2016 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

20 Apr 2016

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/1098/2016 Of Flex Art Foil Ltd v. Dy. Director Of Income Tax (Inv), Unit-Iii, Mumbai And 4 Ors, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

Section 153 case law →

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 828 OF 2016 Ess Dee Alluminium Ltd. .. Petitioner v/s. Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv.)& Ors. .. Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 829 OF 2016 Flex Art Foil Ltd. .. Petitioner v/s. Dy. Director of Income Tax (Inv.) & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. Ajaykumar Singh for the petitioner Mr. Anil Singh, Addl. Solicitor General a/w Ashok Kotangale i/b Ms. Padma Divakar CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. P.C. DATED : 20[th] APRIL, 2016. 1.Mr. Singh, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with liberty to raise all contentions, including those raised in these petitions in his challenge to the assessment orders dated 29[th] March, 2016 passed under Section 153(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 before the appellate authorities under the Act. Liberty as prayed for is granted. 2.Both the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.