Wp/11030/2022 Of Anurag Agrawal v. Income Tax Department
High Court
03 Apr 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Wp/11030/2022 Of Anurag Agrawal v. Income Tax Department
Date of order
03 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/11030/2022 Of Anurag Agrawal v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having renderedinfructuous. pn (S.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUSHRUT ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTAON THE 3[rd] OF APRIL, 2023
WRIT PETITION No. 11030 of 2022
BETWEEN:-
ANURAG AGRAWAL S/O SHRI VISHWANATH AGRAWAL,AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCCUPATION: BUSINESS 55, 44-A MECHANIC NAGAR, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(SHRI ASHISH GOYAL, LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER)
AND
1.INCOME TAX OFFICER - 5(1), INDORE AAYAKARBHAWAN, OPPOSITE WHITE CHURCH,RESIDENCY AREA, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
2.PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 AAYAKARBHAWAN, OPPOSITE WHITE CHURCH,RESIDENCY AREA, INDORE (MADHYA PRADESH)
(NONE FOR THE RESPONDENTS)
.....RESPONDENTS
This petition coming on for orders this day, JUSTICE SUSHRUT
ARVIND DHARMADHIKARI passed the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of thepetition, the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, therefore,this petition has rendered infructuous.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having renderedinfructuous.
pn
(S. A. DHARMADHIKARI)JUDGE
2
(PRAKASH CHANDRA GUPTA)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue