Case LawHigh Court › Wp/111068/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. Th...

Wp/111068/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds)

High Court 06 Jan 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/111068/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds)
Date of order
06 Jan 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/111068/2015 Of Corporation Bank v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Tds), the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THER 0 DAY OF JANUARY, 2017 BRHRFO THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK G. NARBNDAR W.P. NOS. 111068!111074/20105 (!IT) BETWEEN CORPORATION BANK,REP. BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER,ORI. B.P. DAS, AGED ABOUT: 47 YEARS,NEW COTTON MARKET BRANCH,128, SRI. MOORUSAVIRAMATHGINNING AND PRESSING CO., BUILDING, P.B.NO. 605, NEW COTTON MARKET,HUBBALLI-580O O29. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI. A SHANKAR & SHRI. M. LAVA & SHRI,SHASHANK HEGDE, ADVS.) AND 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (TDS)OFFICK OF THR COMMISSIONBR OFINCOME-TAX (TDS), PANAJI-GOA,GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS,RUA-DE-OQUREM, PANAJI, GOA-403 OO1OFFICK OF THR COMMISSIONBR OFINCOME-TAX (TDS), PANAJI-GOA,GROUND FLOOR, PUNDALIK NIWAS,RUA-DE-OQUREM, PANAJI, GOA-403 OO1 2.THR ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX(TDS), RANGE, HUBBALLI,OFFICK OF THR ADDITIONALCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,TDS RANGE, CENTRAL REVENUEBUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025,(TDS), RANGE, HUBBALLI,OFFICK OF THR ADDITIONALCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX,TDS RANGE, CENTRAL REVENUEBUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580 025, 3.THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER,TDS WARD-1,TDS WARD-1, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-9580 O29 .. RESPONDENTS THESEWRIT|PRTITIONSARERILBDUNDERARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUIION OF INDIAPRAYING TO DIRECT THR RBSPONDENT NO.1 TO STAYTHR RBCOVBRY OF TAXKS TILL DISPOSAL OF THEAPPBAL FILED BEFORE THR LEARNED COMMISSIONBROF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AND ETC, THESEWRIT|PRTITIONS|COMINGON|FORPRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THEROLLOWING: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo praying leave of the court to withdraw the writ petitions. Memo is taken on record. The writ petitions aredismissed as withdrawn. Sd/-JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan