Wp/111/2011 Of M/S. Amortex Agencies Pvt. Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, And 2 Ors
High Court
15 Feb 2011 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/111/2011 Of M/S. Amortex Agencies Pvt. Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, And 2 Ors
Date of order
15 Feb 2011
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/111/2011 Of M/S. Amortex Agencies Pvt. Ltd v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax-Iii, And 2 Ors, the High Court (2011) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1 wp111-11
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.111 OF 2011
M/s. Amartex Agencies Pvt. Ltd.
..Petitioner.
V/s.
The Chief Commissioner of Income Tax-III & Ors.
..Respondents.
Mr. S.M. Kamble for petitioner.
Ms. Suchitra Kamble for respondents.
CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATED : 15TH FEBRUARY, 2011
P.C. :-
1.The petitioner is challenging the order of the CCIT dated 28/11/2007 whereby the application seeking waiver of interest levied under Section 220(2A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 has been rejected by the Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai. The petition suffers from gross delay. No explanation is given for the inordinate delay in filing the Writ Petition. In this view of the matter, we see no reason to entertain this petition. The petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue