Case LawHigh Court › Wp/111517/2019 Of Mrs.lalitha Girish Hat...

Wp/111517/2019 Of Mrs.lalitha Girish Hattarki v. The Dy.director Of Income Tax (Investigations)

High Court 26 Sep 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/111517/2019 Of Mrs.lalitha Girish Hattarki v. The Dy.director Of Income Tax (Investigations)
Date of order
26 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/111517/2019 Of Mrs.lalitha Girish Hattarki v. The Dy.director Of Income Tax (Investigations), the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signed byTHEJASKUMAR NLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 111517 OF 2019 (TIT) BETWEEN: MRS. LALITHA GIRISH HATTARKI, AGE: 47 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: PLOT NO.10898, 1 MAIN, 5 CROSS, BEHIND SAIT PETROL PUMP, SADASHIV NAGAR, BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SANGRAM.S.KULKARNI., ADVOCATE) AND: THE DY. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATIONS), 2 FLOOR, SURESH COMPLEX, SANJAY GANDHI NAGAR, BALLARI-583 101. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. Y.V.RAVIRAJ., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR HEARING-INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Sri.Sangram S.Kulkarni., for the petitioner and Sri.Y.V.Raviraj., counsel for the respondent have appeared in person. 2. The captioned Writ Petition is filed seeking a Writ of Mandamus directing the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Investigations) / jurisdictional officer to consider the representation dated 28.05.2019 submitted by the petitioner and transfer the enquiry to Belagavi as far as it relates to the petitioner. 3. Counsel for the respective parties urged several contentions. Heard the contentions and perused the Writ papers with care. 4. After arguing the matter for sometime, counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the Writ Petition for the time being with a liberty to seek an appropriate relief if need be at an appropriate stage. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. - 3 - NC: 2024:KHC-D:14067 5. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. A liberty is accorded for the petitioner to seek an appropriate relief if need be at an appropriate stage. TKN List No.: 2 Sl No.: 11.2 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan