Case LawHigh Court › Wp/1115/2020 Of M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas...

Wp/1115/2020 Of M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 20 Jan 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/1115/2020 Of M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
20 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/1115/2020 Of M/S Sundaram Bnp Paribas v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.S. DINESH KUMAR !WRIT PETITION No.1115 OF 2020 (GMRES) BETWEEN M/S. SUNDARAM BNP PARIBAS|HOME FINANCE LIMITED|NO.8, GROUND FLOORSAI PRABHU, SIRUR PARKB-STREET, SHESHADRIPURAMBANGALORE-560 O7OREPRESENTED BY ITSAUTHORIZED OFFICERMR. S.M. KUTTAPPA PETITIONER| (BY SMT. R. RADHA, ADVOCATE) 1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)NO.284/1, PARK VIEW BUILDING1 FLOOR, P.J. EXTENSIONNO.284/1, PARK VIEW BUILDING1 FLOOR, P.J. EXTENSION DAVANGERE-5//7 OQO 2 |THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, A-WING, 4 FLOOR|KENDRIYA SADAN, 17 MAIN2 BLOCK, NEAR KENDRIYA SADAN>KORAMANGALABANGALORE-560 034 |INCOME TAX, A-WING, 4 FLOOR|KENDRIYA SADAN, 17 MAIN2 BLOCK, NEAR KENDRIYA SADAN>KORAMANGALABANGALORE-560 034 | ... RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 2277 OF THECONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS WRIT OF!MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE R-1L AND 2 TO FURNISH THE COPY OFTHE ORDER OF INCOME TAX APPEAL. 2 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR,PRELIMINARY HEARING|THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The prayer made in this writ petition is to direct the respondents|tO.furnishaCODY_ofthe _order in Income Tax Appeal No. CIT(A)65/HBL/DVG/2014-15(Assessment year 2011-12). 2. 70a specific query made by this Court, learnedadvocate for the petitioner, in his usual fairness, submitted|that if an application seeking a copy of the order is madebefore the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the same willbe issued. | 3. Hence, this petition is misconceived and it isaccordinglydismissed.No costs.| Yn.| Sd/- JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan