Wp/1118/2016 Of Mwh India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 9(2) And 4 Ors
High Court
23 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1118/2016 Of Mwh India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 9(2) And 4 Ors
Date of order
23 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/1118/2016 Of Mwh India Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 9(2) And 4 Ors, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.In the above view, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1118 OF 2016
MWH India Private Limited..PetitionerVersusDeputy Commissioner of Income TaxCircle 9(2) and 4 Ors.
..Respondents
...........
Mr. Niraj Sheth a/w P. C. Tripathi i/b. Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.Mr. Arvind Pinto for the Respondents.
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 23RD JUNE, 2016
P.C.:
1.This Petition challenges the orders of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax refusing to grant a stay of demand consequent to the final assessment order dated 31[st] January, 2014 passed by the Assessing Officer under Section 143(3) read with Section 144-C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act).
2.Mr. Sheth, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that their appeal from the order dated 31[st] July, 2014 of the Assessing Officer is pending with Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). In the above circumstances, the petitioner seeks to withdraw this Petition and
2
approach the Tribunal for grant of stay in the pending appeal from the order dated 31[st] May, 2014 in respect of A.Y. 2009-2010.
3.Mr. Pinto, the learned counsel for the Revenue states that in case the appeal is filed as aforesaid within a period of two weeks, the Revenue would not adopt any coercive proceedings for recovery till the disposal of the stay application by the Tribunal.
4.In the above view, the Petition is disposed of as withdrawn in the aforesaid terms.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.