Wp/1121/2016 Of Rajiv Basrur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle - 1(2) And 2 Ors
High Court
29 Jun 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1121/2016 Of Rajiv Basrur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle - 1(2) And 2 Ors
Date of order
29 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/1121/2016 Of Rajiv Basrur v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle - 1(2) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1121 OF 2016
Rajiv Basrur..Petitioner
VersusThe Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax & Ors...Respondents
...........
Mr. Pankaj Toprani a/w Ms. Krupa Toprani i/b. PRH Juris Consults for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kanani for the Respondents.
...........CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 29TH JUNE, 2016
P.C.:
1.This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks a direction to respondent no.1 (The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(2)) to grant a refund of Rs.17.31 lakhs along with interest. This demand for refund of Rs.17.31 lakhs was first made by the petitioner on 6[th] March, 2014. The petitioner thereafter has regularly reminded the officer concerned to dispose of his claim for refund. However, the same is not being done. No explanation for delay in disposal of the claim for refund is forthcoming.
2
2.In the above view, we direct the respondent no.1 (Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-1(2)) to dispose of the petitioner's refund application dated 6[th] March, 2014 after following the principles of natural justice within five weeks from today.
3.Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.