Case LawHigh Court › Wp/114/2007 Of Housing Development Finan...

Wp/114/2007 Of Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Mumbai v. The Joint Cmmissioner Of Income-Tax (Osd) Range 1 (1), Mumbai And 2 Ors

High Court 29 Jan 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/114/2007 Of Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Mumbai v. The Joint Cmmissioner Of Income-Tax (Osd) Range 1 (1), Mumbai And 2 Ors
Date of order
29 Jan 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/114/2007 Of Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. Mumbai v. The Joint Cmmissioner Of Income-Tax (Osd) Range 1 (1), Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, Rule is made absolute and the petition stands disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY WRIT PETITON NO.114 OF 2007 WRIT PETITON NO.114 OF 2007 WRIT PETITON NO.114 OF 2007 Housing Development Finance Corpn.Ltd. ..Petitioner. V/s. The Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax & Anr. ..Respondents. Mr.F.V.Irani i/b. with A.K.Jasani for petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rao for respondents. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 29TH JANUARY, 2007. J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 29TH JANUARY, 2007. P.C. :- P.C. :- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent. Rule, returnable forthwith. The petition is taken up for final hearing by the consent of the parties. 2. In the above petition, it is a case regarding reopening of the assessment order under section 148 of the Income Tax Act. In the above case, the petitioner has filed their objections on 25th September, 2006. Till date no decision is taken with regard to the said objections. - = : 2 : = - 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner pointed out that in some of the cases as soon as the objections were rejected by the concerned I.T.O., even the assessment order has been passed within a very short time whereby the assessee is left without any remedy to challenge the said rejection. 4. We make it clear that if the assessing officer does not accept the objections so filed, he shall not proceed further in the matter within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of service of the said order on objections, on the assessee. 5. Accordingly, Rule is made absolute and the petition stands disposed of. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan