Case LawHigh Court › Wp/1147/2016 Of Iot Infrastructure And E...

Wp/1147/2016 Of Iot Infrastructure And Energy Services Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax 15(2)(1) And 4 Ors

High Court 07 Jul 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1147/2016 Of Iot Infrastructure And Energy Services Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax 15(2)(1) And 4 Ors
Date of order
07 Jul 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/1147/2016 Of Iot Infrastructure And Energy Services Ltd v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax 15(2)(1) And 4 Ors, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Decision: 4.Petition is disposed of on the aforesaid directions.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1147 OF 2016 IOT Infrastructure & Energy Services Ltd. .. Petitioner v/s. The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax15(2)(1) and Ors. .. Respondents Ms. Vasanti B. Patel for the petitioner Mr. Suresh Kumar for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J. P.C. DATED : 7[th] JULY, 2016. 1.The petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India now seeks only a direction to the Revenue to process the petitioner's refund claim by giving effect to the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal as well as expeditiously disposing of the petitioner's claim with regard to the TDS credit claimed by it. This on the ground that inspite of repeated requests from 2013 onwards, the respondents are not acting upon it. 2.The Counsel for the parties hand over the following statement indicating the quantum of refund be processed :- 3.On instructions of Mr. Prabhakar Rajan, ACIT 15(2)(1), Mr. Suresh Kumar states that the item listed at Sr. No.2 above with regard to Rs.3.89 crores would be given effect to within three weeks from today and the refund consequent thereto would be handed over to the petitioner within one week thereafter. So far as Sr. No.3 above is concerned, Mr. Suresh Kumar on instructions states that the same would be disposed after verification within eight weeks from today and the refund, if any, determined as a consequence of the verification, would be given to the petitioner within one week thereafter. Statement to dispose of the refund claims, as above, is accepted. 4.Petition is disposed of on the aforesaid directions. (A.K. MENON, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan