Wp/11506/2013 Of Mr.s.arunkumar v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
29 Jul 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/11506/2013 Of Mr.s.arunkumar v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
29 Jul 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/11506/2013 Of Mr.s.arunkumar v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: With this liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
Mr.S.Arunkumar ...Petitioner
The Income Tax Officer,Business Ward VI (1)Room No.204, New Block, 2[nd] Floor,121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,Chennai – 600 034. ... Respondent
Prayer : Writ Petition filed Under Article226 of theConstitution of India to issue of Writ of Certiorari, callingfor the records of the respondent contained in its impugnedorder dated 28.03.2013 adding an amount of Rs.49,32,135/- to thepetitioner's returned income, and quash the same as illegal andarbitrary.
The order assessment dated 28.03.2013 passed under Section143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is under challenge in thepresent writ petition.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions,made a submission that the petitioner has approached the IncomeTax Department by submitting an application under Vivad SeVishwas Scheme and the said application is pending forconsideration.
3. Even otherwise also, the order under challenge is anoriginal assessment order, which is appealable under theprovisions of the Income Tax Act. Thus, the petitioner has topursue the application filed under the above said scheme orprefer an appeal, challenging the assessment order.
4. However, the merits raised in the present writ petitiondeserves no further adjudication as the petitioner has notexhausted the Appellate remedy and during the pendency of thewrit petition, the petitioner filed an application under theVivad Se Vishwas Scheme. This being the factum, the petitioneris at liberty to workout the remedy in the manner known to law.
5. With this liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently,connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI)
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
KakToThe Income Tax Officer,Business Ward VI (1)Room No.204, New Block, 2[nd] Floor,121, Uthamar Gandhi Salai,Chennai – 600 034.
+1cc to Mr.Suhrith Parthasarathy, Advocate Sr.36467
W.P.No.11506 of 2013
pmk[co]srg 18/08/2021
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.