Wp/1179/2016 Of Latin Manharlal Securities Private Limited And Anr v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 4 Ors
High Court
04 May 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1179/2016 Of Latin Manharlal Securities Private Limited And Anr v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 4 Ors
Date of order
04 May 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/1179/2016 Of Latin Manharlal Securities Private Limited And Anr v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax And 4 Ors, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.
Decision: 4.Petition is disposed of in above terms.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1179 OF 2016
Latin Manharlal Securities Private Limited & Anr.
VersusPrincipal Commissioner of Income TaxCircle-4 Mumbai & Ors.
..Petitioners
..Respondents
...........
Mr. Rajeev Waglay a/w Dinesh Parmar i/b. DSR Legal for the Petitioners.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
...........
CORAM: M. S. SANKLECHA & A. K. MENON, JJ.
DATE : 4TH MAY, 2016
P.C.:
1.This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 1[st] March, 2016 passed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) transferring the petitioners assessment proceedings from Mumbai to Ahmedabad.
2.Mr. Suresh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue, on instructions, states that as the impugned order has been passed in
breach of the principles of natural justice the impugned order may be set aside with liberty to pass fresh order of transfer under Section 127 of the Act.
3.In the above view, the impugned order dated 1[st] March, 2016 is set aside with liberty as sought by the Revenue. Needless to state that the order passed under Section 127 of the Act will be in accordance with principles of natural justice.
4.Petition is disposed of in above terms. No order as to costs.
(A. K. MENON, J.)
(M. S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.