Wp/11943/2015 Of Dinshaw Cawasji v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
24 Mar 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/11943/2015 Of Dinshaw Cawasji v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
24 Mar 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/11943/2015 Of Dinshaw Cawasji v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURU|
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF MARCH, 20109
BEREROR
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR.
W. PNO.11943/2015ANTW.P.NOS.12137"12138/20105 ("IT)
BETWEEN:
DINSHAW CAW ASL AGED ABOUT 52 YEARSNO.16, ALEXANDRA STREET)BENGALURU-560 O25... PETITIONBR
(BY SRI SHANKAR A AND SRI M. LAVA ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.THER ASSISTANT COMMISSIONBROF INCOME TAX.OF INCOME TAX.
CIRCLE-1(1).
OFFRICEHK OF TDEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, 6 FLOOR,HMT BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD,GGANGANAGARBENGALURU-560 032..DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, 6 FLOOR,HMT BHAVAN, BELLARY ROAD,GGANGANAGARBENGALURU-560 032..
|THERE COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1.' FLOOR, HMT BHAVANBELLARY ROAD,|GGANGANAGARBENGALURU-560 O32.... RESPONDENTSINCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1.' FLOOR, HMT BHAVANBELLARY ROAD,|GGANGANAGARBENGALURU-560 O32.... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. E.I. SANMATHI, STANDING PANEL COUNSEL)
THESE WRIT PETITIONS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226)AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TOQUASH THE NOTICE VIDE ANN-Al, A2 AND AS ISSUEDUNDER SECTION 226(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT BY THER-1 TO THE BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC BANK, RICHMONDROAD, BENGALURU-560 O27 DATED 12.03.2015 VIDEANNE XURE-Al AND ETC.,
THRSHK PRTITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Sri A Shankar, learned Advocate appearingfor petitioner and Sn E.I.Sanmathi, learned panel|counsel appearing for respondent.
iaeri A Shankar, learned Advocate appearing.for petitioner after arguing the matter for considerable|length of time, seeks permission of the Court to|withdraw this writ petition and pursue his grievance|before CIT (Appeals) and CIT (Admn.).
Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed aswithdrawn.
O|
Petitioner is at liberty to pursue his grievancebefore appropriate forum for appropriate relief. All|contentions of the parties are left open.
Sd/-
JUDGE
s>9
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue