Case LawHigh Court › Wp/12083/2012 Of Som Prakash Garg And An...

Wp/12083/2012 Of Som Prakash Garg And Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr

High Court 03 Jan 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Wp/12083/2012 Of Som Prakash Garg And Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
03 Jan 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/12083/2012 Of Som Prakash Garg And Anr v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Decision: 2, respondents shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner for recovery of the balance amount.The petition stands disposed of.C c as per rules.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

03/01/2013 W.P. no. 12083/2012 Mr. B.M. Maheshwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri R.L. Jain, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the respondents. By filing this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged notice issued by respondent on 17/12/2012 ( Annexure- P/1 ) under section 226(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961. According to the petitioner, loan which was obtained by the petitioner from M/s Empire Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd, Indore was repayable by July, 2013. In that circumstance, according to the petitioner, they are ready to make clear amount which is balanced towards the outstanding dues of M/s Empire Infrastructures Pvt Ltd, but by way of some installments payable upto 31[st] July, 2013. Learned Sr. Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that if the petitioner makes appropriate application in that regard to the Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, the respondent no. 2, the same shall be considered and appropriate decision in that regard shall be taken. In view of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, we are inclined to give liberty to the petitioner to submit appropriate application in that regard within ten days from today. On submission of such application, second respondent shall consider and take appropriate decision on it in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible, but not later by two weeks from its receipts. Till appropriate decision as aforesaid is taken by amol respondent no. 2, respondents shall not take any coercive steps against the petitioner for recovery of the balance amount.The petition stands disposed of.C c as per rules. ( SHANTANU KEMKAR ) JUDGE ( M.C. GARG ) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan