Case Law › High Court › Wp/12090/1998 Of M/S. Bhagyanagar Studio...

Wp/12090/1998 Of M/S. Bhagyanagar Studios v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 14 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

14 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/12090/1998 Of M/S. Bhagyanagar Studios v. The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Writ Petition No. 12090 of 1998 Dated: 14-02-2013 Between: M/s Bhagyanagar Studios, rep. by itsManaging Partner Badam Ramaswamy And The Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle-VI (1), Hyderabad and another …Petitioner …Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Writ Petition No. 12090 of 1998 Oral order(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) It is represented by Ms. K.Prabhavathi, learned counselrepresenting Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel that the cause in thiswrit petition does not survive for further adjudication. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 14[th] February, 2013 GRR _______________________________M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.