Case Law › High Court › Wp/1219/2006 Of Superb Minerals Private...

Wp/1219/2006 Of Superb Minerals Private Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Range-2(1), Nashik And Ors

High Court 20 Mar 2006 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

20 Mar 2006

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/1219/2006 Of Superb Minerals Private Ltd v. Income Tax Officer Range-2(1), Nashik And Ors, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: With the aforesaid order, the writ petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1219 OF 2006 Superb Minerals Pvt. Ltd. .. Petitioner. V/s. Income-tax Officer, Range-2(1), Nashik & Others .. Respondents. Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the petitioner. Mr.B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs.P.P. Bhosale for the respondents. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2006. DATED : 20TH MARCH, 2006. P.C. : For the reasons that we indicated in our order passed today while dismissing the writ petition No.1218 of 2006, this writ petition also does not deserve to be admitted. 2. We dismiss the writ petition in limine, accordingly. 3. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise the plea before the Assessing Officer that the expenditure claimed by the petitioner has a nexus with the interest receipt and that there was no escapement of income. 2 4. If any adverse order is passed by the Assessing Officer in re-assessment proceedings, the petitioner shall be at liberty to raise this ground in appeal before the appellate authority. 5. With the aforesaid order, the writ petition is dismissed. (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.