Case Law › High Court › Wp/1219/2012 Of Smt.k.lakshmi Prasanna v...

Wp/1219/2012 Of Smt.k.lakshmi Prasanna v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 25 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

25 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/1219/2012 Of Smt.k.lakshmi Prasanna v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAOWrit Petition No. 1219 of 2012 Dated: 25-02-2013 Between: Smt K.Lakshmi Prasanna AndCommissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),Visakhapatnam and another. …Petitioner …Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Writ Petition No. 1219 of 2012 Oral order(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) Dr. J.V.S.H.Sastry, learned counsel representing Sri Ch.Dhanamjaya, learned counsel for the petitioner states that thecause in this writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed asinfructuous. No costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 25[th] February, 2013 GRR/SIVA _______________________________M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.