Wp/1222/2014 Of Status Impex Private Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 And Anr
High Court
06 May 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1222/2014 Of Status Impex Private Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 And Anr
Date of order
06 May 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/1222/2014 Of Status Impex Private Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax-4 And Anr, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1285 OF 2014
Sampoorna Exports Pvt. Ltd.
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai & Anr.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1286 OF 2014
Teejay Entertainment Ltd....PetitionerV/s.The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai & Anr....Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1288 OF 2014
Devashish Exports Pvt. Ltd....PetitionerV/s.The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai & Anr....Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1289 OF 2014
Status Impex Pvt. Ltd.
...Petitioner
V/s.
The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai & Anr....Respondents
WITH
WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1291 OF 2014
Sundatta Sirur Pvt. Ltd....Petitioner
V/s.The Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Mumbai & Anr....Respondents
Mr.Percy Pardiwalla, Senior counsel with Mr.Madhur Agrawal and Mr.Atul K. Jasani for the Petitioner.
Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Respondents.
CORAM : S.J. VAZIFDAR &
P.C. :-
1.By consent the writ petitions are taken up for admission.2.Rule. Rule is made returnable and heard finally.
3.Mr.Suresh Kumar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents admits that the petitioners have not been afforded a hearing before passing the orders for transfer of the petitioners' cases from Mumbai to Jaipur. Mr.Pardiwalla, the learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners states that even no notice has been served upon the petitioners.
4.In view of the above, the impugned orders are quashed and set-aside. The respondents however, shall be at liberty to issue a fresh notice and proceed in accordance with law.
There shall be no order as to costs.
(B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.J. VAZIFDAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue