Wp/12307/2015 Of Amith Bethala (Huf) v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
23 Jul 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/12307/2015 Of Amith Bethala (Huf) v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Jul 2015
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/12307/2015 Of Amith Bethala (Huf) v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.DATED THIS THE 23[rd]DAY OF JULY 2015
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO. 12307 OF 2015 (T-IT)
BETWEEN:
AMITH BETHALA (HUF)NO.81lo, 81H BLOCK,KORAMANGALA,BANGALORE-560 O95,
REPRESHENIED BY ITS KARIAMR AMITH BETHALA,»/O PRAKASH BETHALA,AGED ABOUT 37 YBARS.
_. PRHTITIONBER
(By Sri. HARISH.V.S, ADV.-ABSENT)
AND
INCOME [TAX OFFICERWARD NO. 7 (1), 47TH FLOOR,C WING KENDRIYA SADAN,2ND BLOCK, KORAMANGALA,BANGALORE -560 034.
_. RESPONDENT
THIS WRIT PRTITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND|22/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THECONSEQUENTIAL NOTICE OF DEMAND ISSUED BY THE)RESPONDENT, DATED 23.7.2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR2008-09 1.e. ANN-D, AND IMPUGNED ASSESSMENT ORDERPASSED BY THE ERSPONDENT U/S 143[3] R.W. SECTION 147.
OF THR INCOME TAX ACT 1961 DATED 28.7.2014 FOR THE.ASSESSMENT YEAR JOO8-O9 1.e. VIDE ANN-E. |
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORD ER
There is no representation for the petitioner. |
Office objections not complied with. Petition dismissed.
In.
Sd/-.JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue