In Wp/1246/2022 Of Rajkumar Basudev Agarwal v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 11(2)(1) Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
GAURIAMITGAEKWAD
Digitally signedby GAURI1/1AMITGAEKWADDate:2022.03.0910:43:06 +0530IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.1246 OF 2022
Rajkumar Basudev Agarwal
….Petitioner
V/s.
The Income Tax Officer Ward 11(2)(1) & Ors.
….Respondents
----
Mr. Rohan Deshpande i/b. Ms. Farzeen Khambatta for petitioner.Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for respondents-Revenue.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &N.J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATED : 7[th] MARCH 2022
P.C.:
1After the petition was heard for some time, Mr. Deshpande
states that all points will be raised before the concerned authority and seeksleave of the Court to withdraw the petition.
2Petition dismissed as withdrawn. It is open to petitioner to raiseall contentions before the concerned authority.
(N.J. JAMADAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue