Wp/12559/2015 Of Deepak Bethala (Huf) v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Sep 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/12559/2015 Of Deepak Bethala (Huf) v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Sep 2015
Assessment year(s)
2009-2010
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/12559/2015 Of Deepak Bethala (Huf) v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: For the very same reasons as set out in the order supra, this petition is also accordingly, allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THER HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 3 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2015.
BEEORE
THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY
8WRIT PETITION NO.12559 OF 2015 (TIT)
BETWEHEN
DEEPAK BETHALA (HUF)|NO.3815, BLOCKKORAMANGALABANGALORE — 560 095.RBPRESENTED BY ITS KARTA-MR. DBEBPAK BETHALAS/O PRAKASH BETHALA.AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS. PETITIONER|
(BY SRIHARISH V.s., ADV.)
AND:
THER INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD — 71 (1), 4 FLOOR,‘Cy WING, KENDRIYA SADAN9 BLOCK, KORAMANGALABANGALORE — 560 0434. |
— RESPONDENT
(BY SRLJEEVAN.J.NEERALGI , ADV)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226)AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO)QUASH THE CONSEQUENTIAL NOTICE OF DEMAND|ISSUBD BY THER RESPONDENT DATED 31.07.2014 FOR THEASSKSSMENT YRBAR 2008-09 JB. ANNEXURE-D AND)IMPUGNEDASSESSMENTORDERIPASSEDBY|THE.RESPONDENT U/S 143(3) R.W. SEC.147 OF THE INCOME,TAX ACT, 1961, DATED 28.7.2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT)YEAR 2008-09 LE. ANNEXURE-E.
THIS PRETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARYHEARING,THISDAY,THE.COURTMADETHE.FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The facts of this case are identical to the facts in WP!
No.27414/2015, filed by the very same petitioner in respect of return|
of income for the assessment year 2009-2010 which was allowed by|order dated 14.7.2015.
? In the present case, facts relate to the assessment year,
2008-09. For the very same reasons as set out in the order supra, this
petition is also accordingly, allowed.
AN/-|
SD/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue