Case LawHigh Court › Wp/12606/2012 Of M/S. Venkata Krishna En...

Wp/12606/2012 Of M/S. Venkata Krishna Enterprises v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Jun 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/12606/2012 Of M/S. Venkata Krishna Enterprises v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Jun 2012
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/12606/2012 Of M/S. Venkata Krishna Enterprises v. The Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.12606 of 2012 --Date: 27062012 Between: M/s.Venkata Krishna Enterprises,Rep. by its Manager (Finance)K.Subrahmanyam …Petitioner And Chief Commissioner of Income Tax,Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad and another. …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.Vedula Srinivas Counsel for respondents: Mr.B.Narasimha SarmaThe Court made the following: The Hon'ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy Writ Petition No.12606 of 2012 --Date: 27062012 Order: This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner complainingof the purported inaction on his representation, dated 02-03-2012, in respect of high value transactions entered betweenthird parties. At the hearing, Mr.B.Narasimha Sarma, learnedStanding Counsel for Income Tax, appearing for the respondents, submitted that, as per his instructions,petitioner’s representation, dated 02-03-2012, was notreceived by either of the respondents as the same was notsent to proper addresses. Mr.Vedula Srinivas, learned Counsel for the petitioner,submitted that his client has given another representation on14-06-2012 directed to the correct addresses of therespondents. In view of the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of,without going into the merits of the case and with thedirection to the respondents to consider the representationstated to have been sent by the petitioner on 14-06-2012and initiate action in accordance with law. As a sequel, WPMP.No.15789 of 2012, filed by thepetitioner for interim relief, is disposed of as infructuous. __________________________ (C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy, J) 27[th] June, 2012 LUR
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan