Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1291/2007 Of Ajanta Pharma Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range 9(1), Mumbai And 2 Ors
Date of order
18 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
In Wp/1291/2007 Of Ajanta Pharma Ltd v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Range 9(1), Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: For the reasons recorded in disposal of the Writ Petition No.1290 of 2007, the impugned order dated 7/6/2007 is set aside and the matter remanded back to the respondent No.1 for reconsideration in terms of what we have set out while disposing of the Writ Petition No.1290 of 2007.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1291 OF 2007
WRIT PETITION NO.1291 OF 2007
Ajanta Pharma Ltd. ..Petitioners.
V/s.
The Assistant Commissioner of
Income-tax & Ors. ..Respondents.
Me.J.D.Mistry with R.Muralidhar and Atul K.Jasani for
petitioners.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Parag Vyas and Arun D.
Nagarjun for respondents.
CORAM : F.I.REBELLO AND
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 18TH JULY, 2007.
P.C.:-
1. Rule. Heard forthwith.
2. The issue involved in this petition is
similar to the issue involved in Writ Petition No.1290
of 2007. In the instant case, the assessment period is
2001-2002. For the reasons recorded in disposal of the
Writ Petition No.1290 of 2007, the impugned order dated
7/6/2007 is set aside and the matter remanded back to
the respondent No.1 for reconsideration in terms of
what we have set out while disposing of the Writ
Petition No.1290 of 2007.
3. Rule made absolute accordingly.
(F.I.REBELL0, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.