Case LawHigh Court › Wp/13307/2019 Of Mradul Dubey v. Income...

Wp/13307/2019 Of Mradul Dubey v. Income Tax Officer

High Court 22 Jul 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/13307/2019 Of Mradul Dubey v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
22 Jul 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/13307/2019 Of Mradul Dubey v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.

Decision: In the circumstances, as the petitioner has an alternative efficaciousstatutory remedy to approach the departmental authorities, the petition filedby the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to do so in termsof the office memorandum/circular dated 29.2.2016.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

The High Court Of Madhya PradeshWP-13307-2019 (MRADUL DUBEYVs INCOME TAX OFFICER) [22][-][07][-][2019]Jabalpur, Dated : Shri Nitin Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for respondent No.1. Heard. The petitioner has filed this petition being aggrieved by denial of stay by the Assessing Officer in the income tax proceedings. Admittedly, the petitioner has already approached the JointCommissioner by filing an application seeking review or reconsideration ofhis application for stay. It is pointed out by the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue thatas per Circular dated 29.2.2016 the petitioner can approach the PrincipalCIT/CIT for review of the decision of the Assessing Officer, refusing orgranting stay. In the circumstances, as the petitioner has an alternative efficaciousstatutory remedy to approach the departmental authorities, the petition filedby the petitioner is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to do so in termsof the office memorandum/circular dated 29.2.2016. It goes without saying that in case the petitioner has already done so ordoes so afresh within two weeks from today, the authority concerned shallconsider and decide the same as expeditiously as possible in accordance withlaw. With the aforesaid liberty, the petition filed by the petitioner standsdisposed of. C.C as per rules. (RAVI SHANKAR JHA)ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE mrs. mishra
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan