Case LawHigh Court › Wp/13482/2004 Of Dhanwati Devi Agarwal v...

Wp/13482/2004 Of Dhanwati Devi Agarwal v. Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)

High Court 30 Aug 2004 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/13482/2004 Of Dhanwati Devi Agarwal v. Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions)
Date of order
30 Aug 2004
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/13482/2004 Of Dhanwati Devi Agarwal v. Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions), the High Court (2004) decided the matter.

Decision: Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF AUGUSTTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.ANANDA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 13482 of 2004 Between: Dhanwati Devi Agarwal, Social Welfare Trust, Secunderabad, Rep. by its Trustee, Nirmal Kumar Pandey. AND ..... PETITIONER Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad. .....RESPONDENT Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a Writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other suitable writ, order or direction,quashing the order of the respondent bearing No. F.No. DIT (E) /80G/21(1)/2003-04dated 7-1-2004 and direct the respondent to grant renewal of approval underSection 80-G effective from 1-4-2003. Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.Y.RATNAKAR, Advocate. Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.S.R.ASHOK (SC FOR INCOME TAX) The Court at the stage of admission, made the following : ORDER: (per Sri Bilal Nazki, J) Heard learned Counsel for the parties. With their consent, theWrit Petition is disposed of at this stage. In a similar matter with regard to the same assessee for theyear 2002-2003, by an order dated 29[th] June, 2004 in Writ PetitionNo.12295 of 2003, we had remanded the matter on the ground thatthe Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad had notconsidered all the pleas raised before him. Following the same order,we dispose of the Writ Petition and without going into merits of thecase, direct the respondent to re-hear the matter and take care of allthe pleas raised before him. Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. 30[th] August, 2004. ________________ (BILAL NAZKI, J) ____________________ (S.ANANDA REDDY, J) ajr To 1. The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions), Hyderabad. 2. Two C.D. copies.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan