In Wp/1361/2005 Of M/S Pavani Estates v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Centtral), the High Court (2005) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY
Date: 24—10—2005
W.P. No. 1361 of 2005
Between:
M/s. Pavani Estates rep. by its Managing Director,
Hyderabad.
…Petitioner.
a n d
The Commissioner of Income Tax (Central),
Hyderabad and another
…Respondents.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. SUDERSHAN REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S. ANANDA REDDY
“On being mentioned”
W.P. No. 1361 of 2005
O R D E R:(per Sri B. Sudershan Reddy, J)
Learned counsel for the petitioner Sri S. Ravi states thatno further orders as such are required to be passed in this writpetition and accordingly the petitioner may be granted leave towithdraw the writ petition.
Leave accorded and the writ petition is accordinglydismissed as withdrawn without any order as to costs.
B. Sudershan Reddy, J.
____________________
__________________ S. Ananda Reddy, J.
Date: 24—10—2005.
Note:
Registry to issue revised copy of
the order.
MVB.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue