Wp/13663/2009 Of S.ramchandra Reddy v. The Office Of The Commissioenr Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND NINE PRESENTTHE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMWRIT PETITION NO : 13663 of 2009 Between: S.Ramchandra Reddy, S/o S.Venku Reddy, R/o. 75 TUDA Apartments, Near L.I.C. Ofice, Tirupati, Chittoor District. ..... PETITIONER AND 1 The Office of the Commissioenr of Income Tax, Rep by itsCommissioner , Tirupati, Chittoor District. 2 The Income Tax Officer, Ward-2 (2), Tirupati, Chittoor District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue a Writ or Order more particularly one in the nature ofWrit of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in givinginformation as sought by the petitioner, as arbitrary, illegal, contrary tosections 5, 6 and 7 of the Rights to Information Act 2005 andconsequently direct the respondents to provide the information to thepetitioner and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.R.CHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.: MR.B.NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following : THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICEGODA RAGHURAM W.P.No. 13663 of 2009 21-07-2009 Oral Order: Denial of information by the respondents despite theapplication dated 23-09-2008 made for certain information, isthe complaint in this writ petition. It is represented by the learned counsel for thepetitioner that after the institution of the writ petition, therespondents had made available to the petitioner theinformation earlier sought for and that in the circumstances,the petitioner does not wish to pursue the writ petition. Recording the submission, the writ petition is dismissed as‘infructuous’. No costs. ____________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J Dated: 21-07-2009Pvks