Case LawHigh Court › Wp/13665/1997 Of G.v.kumari v. The Commi...

Wp/13665/1997 Of G.v.kumari v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 16 Sep 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/13665/1997 Of G.v.kumari v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
16 Sep 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/13665/1997 Of G.v.kumari v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINIand THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.13665 OF 1997 Dated: 16.9.2013 Between: G.V.Kumari, W/o.G.B.K.Rao .. Petitioner And The Commissioner of Income Tax, A.P. Circle 2,Ayakar Bhavan, Hyderabad And another .. Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G.ROHINIand THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No.13665 OF 1997 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice G.Rohini) It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner thatthe cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication onmerits. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending inthis writ petition shall stand closed. _____________ G.ROHINI, J ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J Date: 16.9.2013YS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan