In Wp/13666/2011 Of Jai Narayan Chouksey v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid liberty, for the present finding no further indulgence is called for, this petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
25/03/2014.
Shri Sumit Nema, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Shri Sanja Lal, learned counsel for the respondents.
Considering the fact that during pendency of the writ petition, the assessment proceedings are already over and appeal has been filed by the petitioner which is pending consideration before the appellate authority, for the present no further indulgence into the matter by this court is called for.
With regard to the release of jewellery and other items is concerned, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue the matter before the appellate authority and it would be for the appellate authority to take a decision in the matter in accordance to law.
With the aforesaid liberty, for the present finding no further indulgence is called for, this petition is disposed of.
Certified copy as per rules.
(Rajendra Menon)
Judge
(A.K. Sharma)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue