Case LawHigh Court › Wp/138/2005 Of Panchacharya Society v. T...

Wp/138/2005 Of Panchacharya Society v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors

High Court 21 Mar 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/138/2005 Of Panchacharya Society v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors
Date of order
21 Mar 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/138/2005 Of Panchacharya Society v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Ors, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.138 OF 2005 -------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, office : Memorandum of Coram, : appearances of,Court’s : Court’s order Judge’s orders orders or directions : and Registrar’s orders : -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mr.M.K.Kulkarni for petitioner. Mr.A.S.Rao for respondents. CORAM: V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED: 21ST MARCH, 2005. CORAM: V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED: 21ST MARCH, 2005. 1. On the motion made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, he is allowed to withdraw this petition. Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. All contentions of the petitioner are kept open. (V.C.DAGA, J.) (J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan