Case Law › High Court › Wp/1385/2021 Of Manojkumar Parasmal Chan...

Wp/1385/2021 Of Manojkumar Parasmal Chandan v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-19, Mumbai And 2 Ors

High Court 30 Aug 2021 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

30 Aug 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp/1385/2021 Of Manojkumar Parasmal Chandan v. Pr. Commissioner Of Income-Tax-19, Mumbai And 2 Ors, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byMEERAMEERAMAHESHMAHESHJADHAVJADHAVDate:2021.09.0111:25:50+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO. 1385 OF 2021 Manojkumar Parasmal Chandan ….Petitioner V/s. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-19 Mumbau & Ors. …Respondents ---- Ms Rutuja Pawar for PetitionerMr. Sham Walve for Respondents ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM &ABHAY AHUJA, JJ. DATED : 30[th] AUGUST 2021 P.C. : 1Mr. Walve tenders an affidavit of one Sabhiur Rahman affirmed on27[th] August 2021 in which, it is stated that the rectification application ofpetitioner has been considered and rectification has been carried out. In theaffidavit, it is also stated that the revised form no.3 print out of which hasbeen annexed to the affidavit will be uploaded. The form to be uploadedwithin 10 days from today. 2In view of the above, Ms Pawar seeks leave to withdraw the petition. 3Petition accordingly stands disposed. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.