Wp/1395/2022 Of Vora Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(3)(1) And Anr
High Court
18 Jul 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1395/2022 Of Vora Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(3)(1) And Anr
Date of order
18 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/1395/2022 Of Vora Financial Services Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 2(3)(1) And Anr, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONWRIT PETITION NO.1395 OF 2022
Vora Financial Services Pvt Ltd.
V/s.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax,Circle 2(3)(1), Mumbai & Anr
….Petitioner
…Respondents
----
Mr. K. Gopal a/w Mr. Om Kandalkar for Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for Respondents.
----
CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & FIRDOSH. P. POONIWALLA, JJ DATED : 18[th] JULY 2023
P.C. :
1 After the petition was heard for sometime, Mr. Gopal stated thatrespondent no.1 should be directed to give a personal hearing to petitionerbefore passing any further order. In our view that is a very reasonablerequest.
2Mr. Suresh Kumar stated that matter would be referred to facelessassessment officer.
3Faceless assessment officer shall before passing any order, give apersonal hearing to petitioner, notice whereof shall be communicated atleastfive working days in advance. If Faceless assessment officer is going to relyon any judgments or orders of any court or Tribunal, a list thereof shall alsobe provided alongwith the notice for personal hearing, so that petitionerwill be able to deal with the same / distinguish the same during thepersonal hearing. Any order to be passed including the assessment order
shall be a reasoned order dealing with all submissions of petitioner.
5Petition disposed.
6We clarify that we have not made any observation on the merits of the
matter.
(FIRDOSH P POONIWALLA, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.