Case LawHigh Court › Wp/14037/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Bev...

Wp/14037/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd v. The Income-Tax Officer

High Court 13 Feb 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/14037/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd v. The Income-Tax Officer
Date of order
13 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
2010-11
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/14037/2013 Of M/S. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd v. The Income-Tax Officer, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA ANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMARWRIT PETITION No.14037 of 2013 DATE: 13.02.2015Between:M/s. Andhra Pradesh Beverages Corporation Ltd.,Hyderabad.… PetitionerAndThe Income-tax Officer,Ward 1 (1), 4[th] Floor,Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh,Hyderabad and another… Respondents This Court made the following: THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTAANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR WRIT PETITION No. 14037 of 2013 Order:(per Sri Sanjay Kumar,J) This Writ Petition is filed assailing the assessment proceedingspertaining to the Assessment Year 2010-11. This Court, by order dated 30.04.2013 directed the Revenue notto take any coercive steps against the petitioner subject to itsdepositing a sum of Rs.20.00 Crores on or before 10.05.2013 and afurther sum of Rs.20.00 Crores on or before 10.06.2013. It is now stated by the learned counsel for the Revenue that theappeal filed by the petitioner against the subject assessmentproceedings has been disposed of by the Commissioner of IncomeTax (Appeals) – I, Hyderabad, under the order dated 06.02.2015. Acopy of the said order is also placed on record. In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition does not survive forconsideration and is accordingly closed. The interim order dated30.04.2013 shall stand vacated. The amounts deposited by thepetitioner pursuant to the interim order shall abide by the result of theappeal or any further orders passed thereon. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also standclosed. No costs. _________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ Date: 13.02.2015 _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan