Case LawHigh Court › Wp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)

Wp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)

High Court 04 Feb 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds)
Date of order
04 Feb 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Tds), the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

W.P. No.1423/2014 04/02/2014 Shri Mukesh Agrawal, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Lal, Advocate for the respondents. Heard, counsel for the parties. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has already resorted to remedy of statutory appeal against the decision of the Assessing Officer on the basis of which order of attachment and garnishee notice were issued. Garnishee notice has already been given effect to. Petitioner is free to seek appropriate interim relief in the appeal proceedings already filed before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). If the petitioner's refund or rectification application, as the case may be, is pending, that also will have to be be considered expeditiously by the concerned Authority. The said application be disposed of preferably within three weeks from the date of producing certified copy of this order before the appellate Authority. Petition disposed of, accordingly. (A.M.Khanwilkar) Chief Justice (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan