Case Law › High Court › Wp/14349/2016 Of Laurel Wires Limited v....

Wp/14349/2016 Of Laurel Wires Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai And Ors

High Court 07 Jun 2018 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

07 Jun 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/14349/2016 Of Laurel Wires Limited v. Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Mumbai And Ors, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Rane* 1/1 * WP--14349-2016 (SR.23) Thursday, 7.6.2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14349 OF 2016 Laurel Wires Limited….Petitioner V/s. Income Tax Appellate TribunalMumbai and Ors. ….Respondents None for the petitioner * * * * * CORAM :- M.S. SANKLECHA, & DATE :- DATE :- SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.7TH JUNE, 2018. P.C. :- 1. This petition was called out in the morning session. None appeared in support of the petition. Therefore, the matter was kept back at 3.00 p.m. Thereafter, when the petition was called out at 3.00 p.m. none appears in support of the petition. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.