Wp/146953/2020 Of Kamadhenu Vivid Udheshagala v. The Income Tax Officer

Digitally signed byPREMCHANDRA M RLocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA NC: 2024:KHC-D:11509 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF AUGUST, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI -WRIT PETITION NO. 146953 OF 2020 (TIT) BETWEEN: KAMADHENU VIVID UDHESHAGALA SOUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITH, SIDDESHWAR ROAD, ATHANI, DIST: BELAGAVI, REP.BY ITS, PRESIDENT SRI. ISHWAR S/O. RAMU MUJAGONI, AGED 45 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. H.R. KAMBIYAVAR., ADVOCATE ) AND: 1. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GOKAK, WARD-1, GOKAK, DR. GHODIGERI’S HOSPITAL BUILDING, BELAGAVI ROAD, GOKAK-591 307. 2. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KMIJI BAI BUILDING, OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELAGAVI-590 001. BELAGAVI-590 001. 3. CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110 001, REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON. 4. MINISTRY OF FINANCE, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, NORTH BLOCK-110 001. NEW DELHI-110 001, NEW DELHI-110 001, REP. BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY. 5. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, ROOM NO.610, 3 GATE, 6 FLOOR, M.S.BUILDING, DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001, REP.BY ITS SECRETARY. 6. REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD, NEAR RAJ BHAVAN, VASANTH NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 052, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER When the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 14.09.2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to do the needful. Again, the petition was listed on 29.10.2022, on that day, two weeks time was granted to comply with the office objections. Once again, the petition was listed on 11.06.2024, on that day, two weeks time was granted to rectify the objections raised by the Registry. Despite granting time, office objections were not complied with. The petition is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections. A perusal of the entire order sheet reveals that despite giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied with. Furthermore, the petition is of the year 2020. Now we are in the month of August 2024. The petition is pending for almost four years. As already noted above, when the matter is called, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioner is not diligent in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and also for non-compliance of office objections. MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29 Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE