Wp/147024/2020 Of Dharwad Urban Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Appeals
High Court
08 Feb 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Wp/147024/2020 Of Dharwad Urban Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Appeals
Date of order
08 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/147024/2020 Of Dharwad Urban Credit Souharda Sahakari Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-Appeals, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: 3.Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
BETWEEN
-W.P.NO.147024/2020 (TIT)
DHARWAD URBAN CREDIT SOUHARDA SAHAKARI LTD CTS 96/B2, G F, F F DUCSS, P.B. ROAD, DHARWAR, ALUR VENKAT RAO CIRCLE, DHARWAR, DHARWAD:580001 KARNATAKA, INDIA (REPRESENTED BY MR. MUKUND PUJAR, AGE:48 YEARS, S/O RAMCHANDRA PUJAR)
(BY SRI SHASHANK S HEGDE, ADV. & SRI NARENDRA KUMAR J. JAIN, ADV.)
.....PETITIONER
AND
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-APPEALS C.R. BUILDING, NAVANAGAR, HUBBALLI-580025
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 1(1), C.R. BUILDING NAVANAGR, HUBBALLI-580025
(BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
…..RESPONDENTS
THIS PETITION FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH AS FAR AS THE PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI OR OTHERWISE THE IMPUGNED LETTER DATED 10.03.2020 ISSUED BY THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT REJECTING THE STAY PETITION FOR THE 2017-18, ENCLOSED IN
ANNEXURE-A VIDE F.NO.STAY PETITION/CIT(A),HUBLI/10261/2019-20 AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition with a liberty to file review petition before the Principal Commissioner.
2.Memo is placed on record.
3.Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- JUDGE
Naa
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.