Wp/15200/2006 Of M/S. Balaji Constructions v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
28 Aug 2006 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/15200/2006 Of M/S. Balaji Constructions v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
28 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/15200/2006 Of M/S. Balaji Constructions v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND SIX
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWARAND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15200 OF 2006
Between:
M/s.Balaji Constructions, rep. by itsManaging Partner T.Venkatesham,Saleemnagar Colony, Malakpet, Hyd.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Commissioner of Income Tax,Range-6, 12[th] Floor, Gagan Vihar,M.J.Market Road, Hyderabad,And another.
....RESPONDENTS
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICEJ.CHELAMESWARAND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICED.APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15200 OF 2006
O R D E R(Per Sri Justice J.Chelameswar)
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Courtto withdraw the writ petition. Permission is accorded.
costs.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No
-----------------------------------JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR
----------------------------
JUSTICE D.APPA RAO
28 AUGUST, 2006
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICEJ.CHELAMESWARAND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICED.APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.15200 OF 2006(Per Sri Justice J.Chelameswar)
28 AUGUST, 2006
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.