Wp/1538/2022 Of Harnarayan Vyas Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward -32(1)(1), Mumbai And 3 Ors
High Court
29 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1538/2022 Of Harnarayan Vyas Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward -32(1)(1), Mumbai And 3 Ors
Date of order
29 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/1538/2022 Of Harnarayan Vyas Huf v. Income Tax Officer Ward -32(1)(1), Mumbai And 3 Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.1538 OF 2022
M/S.HARNARAYAN VYAS HUF
)...PETITIONER
V/s.
INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 32(1)(1)AND OTHERS
))...RESPONDENTS
Mr.Jitendra Singh, Advocate for the Petitioner.Mr.Arvind Pinto, Advocate for the Respondents.
CORAM: K. R. SHRIRAM & N. R. BORKAR, JJ.
P.C.:
DATE
: 29[th] MARCH 2022
1Mr.Arvind Pinto, in fairness, submits that the noticeimpugned in this petition is dated 23[rd] June 2021 and thereforewill be covered by the judgment of this Court pronounced earliertoday in Writ Petition No.1334 of 2021 and other connectedmatters.
2Therefore, the impugned notice is quashed and set aside.3Petition is disposed.
(N. R. BORKAR, J.)
(K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
AVK 1/1
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue