In Wp/1548/2007 Of Roop Kumar Gupta v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO.1548 OF 2007Dated 10-09-2007
Between:
Roop Kumar Gupta and others …Petitioners
And
The Commissioner of Income Tax and
Two others …Respondents
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
AND
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO.1548 OF 2007
O R D E R(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki):
Since the respondents have returned the jewellery, which hasbeen seized from the petitioners, no cause of action survives in thiswrit petition. The writ petition has become infructuous and isaccordingly dismissed. No order as to costs.
___________________________
Bilal Nazki,J
Dated 10[th] September, 2007
____________________________
Ramesh Ranganathan,J
vrn
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue