Wp/1555/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 4 v. M/S. Anchor Electrical Private Ltd
High Court
03 Aug 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/1555/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 4 v. M/S. Anchor Electrical Private Ltd
Date of order
03 Aug 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/1555/2016 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Central) - 4 v. M/S. Anchor Electrical Private Ltd, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In the circumstances, the Petition is dismissed infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1555 OF 2016
Principal Commissioner of Income-Tax(Central)-4.. Petitioner v/s. M/s. Anchor Electrical Pvt. Ltd. .. Respondent
Mr. Suresh Kumar a/w Ms. Samiksha Kanani for the petitioner Mr. Rajesh Poojary i/b Mint and Confreres for the respondent
P.C.
CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & A.K. MENON, J.J.
DATED : 3[rd] AUGUST, 2016.
1.Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner points out that the order impugned in the present petition is dated 4[th ]September, 2015 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal). By the impugned order, the Tribunal granted a stay of recovery for a period of 6 months from 4[th] September, 2015. The period of 6 months has expired on 3[rd] March, 2016 Consequently, the impugned order is no longer in existence.
2.In the circumstances, the Petition is dismissed infructuous.
(A.K. MENON, J.)
(M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.