Case LawHigh Court › Wp/15746/2019 Of Sri. K. Seetharam Rai v...

Wp/15746/2019 Of Sri. K. Seetharam Rai v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 13 Jun 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/15746/2019 Of Sri. K. Seetharam Rai v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
13 Jun 2025
Assessment year(s)
2011-12
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/15746/2019 Of Sri. K. Seetharam Rai v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 15746 of 2019 In the light of the afore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byVANAMALANLocation:High Courtof Karnataka HC-KAR IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD -WRIT PETITION NO. 15746 OF 2019 (TIT)BETWEEN: SRI. K. SEETHARAM RAI AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, S/O S NARAYAN RAI, RESIDING AT DOOR NO.3-100, PUTTUR TALUK, D.K.DISTRICT-574202. RASHMI NIVAS, SAVANNUR VILLAGE AND POST, …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BALRAM R RAO, ADVOCATE) AND: 1.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU. 2.DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) CR BUILDING, ANNEX, CR BUILDING, ANNEX, QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M. DILIP, ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO HC-KAR - 2 - QUASH THE SEARCH WARRANT DTD 31.01.2017 ISSUED BY R-2 HEREIN AND ALL CONSEQUENT PROCEEDINGS THEREIN INCLUDING THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER DTD 28.12.2018 VIDE ANNX-C ISSUED BY R-1; QUASH THE NOTICE DTD 26.07.2018 AND 07.08.2018 ISSUED U/S.153 C OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 BY ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, MANGALURU/R-1 VIDE ANNX-A AND B RESPECTIVELY; QUASH THE ASSESSMENT ORDERS FROM THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2011-12 TO 2017-18 VIDE ANNX-D1-D7. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioner has caused a memo for withdrawal, which reads as under: "The Advocate for the Petitioner prays that he may be permitted to the withdraw the Writ Petition, as the Writ Petition filed is infructuous. Liberty may be reserved to file a fresh Writ Petition or to file recall application in the interest of justice and equity." HC-KAR - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:20352 WP No. 15746 of 2019 In the light of the afore, the petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. SD/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE RB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan